Rootify
CompaniesFAQ
Organic Romaine Hearts

Where every line came from

Every record behind Organic Romaine Hearts, with the date we read it. Nothing here is ours — it is all somebody else's published record.

3 of 6 sources have a record
Product recordOn fileOpen Food FactsPhotographNothing on fileNone publishedIngredient listOn fileopen_food_factsRecalls and noticesOn file5 notices, 6 recordsUSDA organic registerNothing on fileCompany not in the exportVerification registersNothing on fileNot in the registers we check

On the label this product is called Organic Romaine Hearts, barcode 0711535502012.

Product record

Name, barcode, category and ingredient text
Open Food FactsOpen Database License (ODbL)read 2026-09-28the record

Photograph

We looked and there is no photograph for this product.

Ingredient list

The ingredient list, in label order
open_food_factsread 2026-09-28the record

Recalls and government notices

Pathogenic non-O157 E.coli STEC found during routine sampling by Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
FDA · Class Iread 2020-11-21the record
F-0144-2021
Wild Harvest Organic Basil has the potential to be contaminated with Cyclospora cayetanensis.
FDA · Class IIread 2020-05-07the record
F-0983-2020
Wild Harvest Organic Unbleached All Purpose Flour in 5 lb. bags has the potential to be contaminated with E. coli (STEC).
FDA · Class IIread 2019-11-26the record
F-0435-2020
Product has the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.
FDA · Class IIread 2015-03-20the record
F-2039-2015
One of this products ingredients, Organic Apple Juice Concentrate, was found to contain patulin levels between 57.4-100 ppb.
FDA · Class IIread 2013-04-11the record
2 agency records under this noticeOne per affected product line
F-1415-2013, F-1414-2013

USDA organic register

This product's company does not appear in the USDA Organic Integrity Database export we matched against.

Verification registers

This product is not in the verification registers we check.

A date here is the date we read the record, not the date the record was published. If one of these is wrong, or a record has changed since we read it, we would rather hear it than not — see corrections.